Posts Tagged ‘Ron Paul’

End the Fed?

December 2nd, 2011 by John Feehery

Earlier this week, Bloomberg Business reported:

The Federal Reserve and the big banks fought for more than two years to keep details of the largest bailout in U.S. history a secret. Now, the rest of the world can see what it was missing. The Fed didn’t tell anyone which banks were in trouble so deep they required a combined $1.2 trillion on Dec. 5, 2008, their single neediest day. Bankers didn’t mention that they took tens of billions of dollars in emergency loans at the same time they were assuring investors their firms were healthy. And no one calculated until now that banks reaped an estimated $13 billion of income by taking advantage of the Fed’s below-market rates, Bloomberg Markets magazine reports in its January issue.

Saved by the bailout, bankers lobbied against government regulations, a job made easier by the Fed, which never disclosed the details of the rescue to lawmakers even as Congress doled out more money and debated new rules aimed at preventing the next collapse. A fresh narrative of the financial crisis of 2007 to 2009 emerges from 29,000 pages of Fed documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act and central bank records of more than 21,000 transactions. While Fed officials say that almost all of the loans were repaid and there have been no losses, details suggest taxpayers paid a price beyond dollars as the secret funding helped preserve a broken status quo and enabled the biggest banks to grow even bigger.

Campaign Theories

October 26th, 2011 by John Feehery

It is generally assumed that Herman Cain will not be the Republican nominee for President. Likewise, it is assumed that Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum, Ron Paul, Michele Bachmann, Jon Huntsman and Gary Johnson won’t get the nomination either.

That leaves Rick Perry and Mitt Romney.

The Perry campaign assumes that the dominant conservative wing of the party will never nominate somebody like Mitt Romney.

The Romney campaign assumes that Rick Perry is not ready for prime time and that his Texas shtick won’t translate beyond the Lone Star State.

Neither the Perry nor the Romney campaign are completely sold on their assumptions though, which is why they are slugging away at each other, ignoring the rest of the field, especially the current front-running, Mr. Cain.

Perry and Romney are the only two candidates who have the money to last them past January. If Santorum wins Iowa, perhaps his campaign might breathe in some new life, but I wouldn’t bank on it.

Perry is running the same campaign that he ran against Kay Bailey Hutchinson, the Senator from Texas and his chief rival in his re-election bid. The whole Republican establishment supported Hutchinson, but Perry ran far to her right, nodded to the secessionist wing of the party, condemned her work as an appropriator, called her a Washington insider, and basically bludgeoned her with sharp attacks on her conservative bone fides.

Obama and His Critics

September 21st, 2011 by John Feehery

I was working out at the gym this morning (I know, miracles never cease), and I looked over briefly (I know, you don’t believe me), at the television and saw one of the hosts interviewing Rachel Maddow.

I am not the biggest Rachel Maddow fan in the world (ok, I am not really a fan at all) and I immediately assumed that the topic of conversation was on the President’s decision on “don’t ask, don’t tell”, an issue that apparently is important to the MSNBC host.

According to the headline blaring at the bottom of the television screen was “Is Obama losing his base?”

Interesting question, given that the previous day, the President struck a blow for some of his most passionate supporters by going through with change in a long standing military policy.

I will make this observation.

The President is not losing his base (if that is true) because he is moving to the middle.  He is losing his base for largely the same reasons that he is losing the middle and losing the rest of the country.

Sheer incompetence.

The Reagan Library Debate

September 8th, 2011 by John Feehery

Rick Perry walked into an ambush at the Reagan Library last night, as he took hits on his record, on his rhetoric, and on his philosophy.  John Huntsman revived his campaign with a sparkling performance.  Newt Gingrich took on the role of Spiro Agnew by once again attacking the media for asking questions about the differences between the candidates (which I thought was the purpose of the debate).  Michelle Bachmann joined Herman Cain in the irrelevance caucus.  Rick Santorum scored a good hit against Perry, which eliminated his chance to be named to the ticket by the Big Texan.  Ron Paul went where no Republican has gone before on the libertarian scale.

And Mitt Romney won the debate.

The line of the night was Perry’s Ponzi scheme claim, an utterance that will live in infamy in 30-second commercials from every anti-Perry organization on the planet for the next six months.

The second best line came from Romney:  “I don’t want to eliminate Social Security.  I want to save it.”

Bachmann Rises

August 15th, 2011 by John Feehery

I caught some of Michele Bachmann’s appearances as I drove down to Florida on my family vacation.  She was doing one of the Sunday talk shows after her Ames, Iowa victory, and she sounded articulate and smart enough to hold her own.

The Republican Party of Iowa has already had an outsized influence on the GOP primary process.  By elevating Bachmann and the Libertarian Ron Paul over Tim Pawlenty, the Straw poll voters knocked out the former Minnesota Governor.

Tim Pawlenty made an attractive candidate on paper.  He had a good record.  He is a nice guy.  He is plenty conservative.  What he didn’t have was a compelling message.  He wasn’t crazy enough to appeal to either the Bachmann or Paul supporters (or the Herman Cainers either), and he wasn’t establishment enough to attract Mitt Romney type money.

I believe and continue to believe that if he portrayed himself as a warrior for the middle class, he could have made a bigger dent in the campaign.   Instead, he kind of wandered from one message to another, at one point warning the party that it was becoming too isolationist, at another, claiming that he was a reformer with results, ala George Bush.

The Ames Straw Poll

August 11th, 2011 by John Feehery

So why are so many political reporters traipsing to Iowa this August?

Well, it must be the Ames Straw poll, a tradition like no other.

The Iowa Republican party plays host to this political beauty contest that has little actual bearing on the actual race for the White House.

Since the straw poll was first started in 1979, it has picked exactly one candidate who went on to become President, George W. Bush.

In fact, since 1980, the Iowa caucus system itself has picked exactly one candidate who went on to become President.

If that is the case, then why should we care what Iowans decide at the Ames Straw poll?

Who cares if Michele Bachmann wins? Who cares if Ron Paul comes in second?

Well, to be candid, we shouldn’t care.

Unless, of course, you are Tim Pawlenty. Pawlenty probably needs to do pretty well if we wants to raise enough money to stay in.

But Pawlenty has bigger problems than Ames, Iowa.

Right now, he doesn’t look like he will be able to compete long-term even if he was able to convincingly sweep the straw poll.

Fixers and Breakers

July 19th, 2011 by John Feehery

There are two kinds of politicians.

Fixers come into office to fix things. They seek to fix problems for their constituents, fix the legislative process and fix government.

Breakers come into office to break things. They seek to take down the political order, break up the status quo and destroy icons.

Fixers occupy the political middle on both the left and the right. They like to work within the system, they don’t demonize their opponents; they tend to be workhorses who find the media a necessary, but tedious evil.

Breakers occupy the political fringes on both the left and the right. They hate the current system. They hate their opponents. They tend to be show horses who use the media to carry their message.

Breakers can become fixers, but fixers rarely become breakers.

Newt Gingrich was a breaker. Denny Hastert was a fixer.

John Boehner is a fixer. Nancy Pelosi was a breaker.

Both Bush’s were fixers, as was Bill Clinton. Ronald Reagan and Barack Obama started as breakers. Franklin Roosevelt campaigned as a fixer, became a breaker when he took the White House (his Hundred Days was a prime example of how the breaker operates) but became a fixer during the Second World War.

Collapse of Cold War Consensus

June 15th, 2011 by John Feehery

It took awhile, but the Cold War consensus is finally shattering.

The Cold War consensus centered around a basic proposition: America was going to both pay and provide the military might to insure the national security of the free world.

America founded NATO as the alliance to promote that security and Congress paid for a national security establishment that guaranteed the dominance of American troops.

That Cold War consensus obviously started at the conclusion of the Second World War, survived both Korea and Vietnam, teetered a bit during the Carter years, and then came back strong during the Reagan years. After the Soviet Union fell apart, it took a while for the Cold War consensus to gain its bearings and its true raison d’etre.

The collapse of Yugoslavia gave the Cold War consensus a shot in the arm, as NATO rushed to the rescue of the Serbian Muslims. George Bush browbeat the alliance in helping with the War on Terror, as the Cold War consensus stretched beyond its natural life.

The war on terror is winding down. We will be out of Iraq before the next election and we may be out of Afghanistan if Congress has anything to say about it.

Rolling Thunder

May 31st, 2011 by John Feehery

Riding my rented bike through the crowd of motorcyclists over the weekend provoked two thoughts: My bike was no match for their hogs, and my shorts and tee-shirt didn’t quite fit in with their duds.

Every Memorial Day, thousands of bikers from around the country flock to Washington D.C. to pay tribute to those who paid the ultimate sacrifice to protect their country. Quite often, traffic shuts down, which is why I was riding my rented bike.

Most of these bikers play the role of the hard-core motorcycle gang member, with their tattoos and their leather regalia. But it is just a role. When they go back home, in all likelihood, they are just normal middle class Americans.

This year, Sarah Palin joined the party.

She, too, was wearing leather, and she too was playing a role. We just haven’t figured out what that role will be.

If she runs for President, she will be the most macho of the candidates running. She will run to the right of Romney, run to the right of Pawlenty, run to the right of Newt Gingrich and run to the right of Ron Paul.

The Libertarians Are Coming

May 6th, 2011 by John Feehery

Ron Paul got some help last night from Gary Johnson in the first Republican Presidential primary debate in South Carolina, and the result was a completely different-looking GOP.

Paul and Johnson may not be serious contenders for the White House, but they had the only really serious message: Get the government out of our bedroom, out of our kitchen, out of our business and out of our lives.

Paul even had the temerity to question why we are giving so much of our hard-earned tax money to Israel, and even more of it to Israel’s enemies. Let them take care of themselves, he said. We should stay out of it.

For a Republican party that dislikes government intrusion in the marketplace, but usually likes a little government to compel some moral behavior out of the people, this was a dramatic break.

Paul and Johnson took turns talking about freedom in its starkest form. If people want to shoot up heroin, what should we care? If gay people want to get married, hey, more power to them. Let’s keep the government out of it.