The Paddy Wagon

August 4th, 2010 by John Feehery

It is unclear whether the paddy wagon got its name from the Irish who were hauled off in police wagons in the late 19th century or from the Irish cops who threw them in there in the first place.

What is clear is that when the Irish descended upon America starting in the 1840’s, it created social disruption, political chaos, and a crime wave for a generation.

My great great grandfather on my father’s side was one of those Paddys who came to New York fleeing a desperate potato famine in the 1840’s, and while I don’t know for sure if old Tom Feehery ever ended up in a paddy wagon, I know for sure that some of his friends probably did.  Tom Feehery was a legal immigrant, but old Joe Hurley (my mother’s grandfather) probably wasn’t.

The No-Nothing Party was founded as a reaction to the Irish masses.  It didn’t do much to stop them though, and pretty soon the Irish were running the big cities, dominating the police forces and fire departments, and making in-roads into the Democratic party North of the Mason-Dixon line.

Power Play

July 20th, 2010 by John Feehery

Renminbi banknote / Photo credit: Polylepsis

In the middle of a very hot summer, I have hockey on my mind.  It’s on my mind, not only because the team of my boyhood dreams – The Chicago Blackhawks – finally won the Stanley Cup after an almost 50 year drought.

It’s on my mind because hockey in many ways is like the world economy.

For much of a hockey game, the two teams play at even strength.  Teams of five skate back and forth against each other trying to score goals against the other team’s goal tender.  But every once in a while, one player is removed from the ice because he commits a penalty, and he goes to the penalty box for anywhere from one minute to five minutes.

When a player is forced to leave the ice, a new dynamic is created called the power play.  A power play gives an advantage to the team that didn’t create the penalty.  And that is when the majority of goals are scored.  When a team is able to score when they are short-handed — when they are at a disadvantage because of the penalty — that can be a turning point in the game.

Blood and Iron

July 7th, 2010 by John Feehery

The nature of national identity came to my mind as I watched the World Cup yesterday.

South Africa is hosting the soccer tournament, the first time an African nation has been given that honor.  Much was made about the quixotic efforts of Ghana (which beat the United States) to be the first African nation to win the tourney.

Not as much has been made about the fact that the Dutch, who were the first settlers in what is now South Africa, have gone so far in winning the tournament.

When the Dutch first came to South Africa, they had the run of the place.  But eventually they had to adjust to reality.  They later became the Boers, and they fought several wars against British colonial rule to maintain their freedom.  They gave in to the Brits, and eventually, they dismantled apartheid, the systematic discrimination of black Africans which was constructed to keep the black majority out of power.  Whites now make up about 10 percent of the population in South Africa, while black Africans make up about 80 percent.

World Cup

June 14th, 2010 by John Feehery

Like Big Wheels, I missed the soccer generation.

Let me explain.  My younger brother was the first in my family to get a Big Wheel, because they came out just at the right time for his height and weight.  I was too big to ever ride a Big Wheel.

And by the time soccer came to my high school, I was already set on football, baseball and especially basketball.  I didn’t have time on my hands to get into soccer because I was too busy doing the other stuff.

So, when it comes to soccer (or football as they call it in other parts of the world), I am a fair weather fan.  I don’t particularly love the game, unless it is the World Cup, and even then, I only root for two teams, the United States and Ireland.

I remember several years ago when the Irish beat the Italians in the World Cup in New York.  That gave me an excuse to go to the Dubliner and hoist of few pints in honor of my ancestral home (as if I needed an excuse).

America is Doomed?

May 27th, 2010 by John Feehery

Planet getting eaten (Credit: ESA/C Carreau)

I was watching television this morning and CNN was alternating between video of the great Gulf leak and a video from the Hubble telescope of a planet getting eaten by a bigger star.

So, the message is if we don’t all kill ourselves, well, then a big star is going to eat us all any way.

On that cheery note, let me add another.

America is doomed.  At least, that is the message that we get all too often from both the left and the right.

We are going broke.  Our workforce isn’t competitive.  People in the rest of the world hate us.  We can’t plug the damn hole.  We have too many immigrants coming into this country.  Crime is too high.  Our military is stretched too far. We are too fat.  We are too old.  We are too young.

And of course, we better all start speaking Chinese soon, because the Chinese are so rich, they work so hard, they are so smart, and there are so many of them, that we really can’t compete. America is doomed.

Really?  Put me down as an America-is-doomed skeptic.

Greece: Beginning and Ends

May 11th, 2010 by John Feehery

A little more than 2300 years ago, Alexander the Great rampaged out of Greece into Asia Minor, and Greek civilization reached its largest sphere of influence.   A few centuries later, the Romans followed suit, and Western civilization would forever be formed in the minds of the Europeans and the world.

After Roman civilization declined, Europe went through some murky times in the Dark Ages, but soon the Renaissance, the Enlightenment and the ideas of free market capitalism, industrialism, scientific progress, democracy and financial innovation made Western nations the most powerful in the world.  The Spanish, the Portuguese, Dutch, the French, the English, the Germans and the Austro-Hungarians all took turns establishing different spheres of influence and empires of different sizes and shapes.

The 20th Century was tough on the Europeans.  Two world wars decimated its wealth and vibrancy (and growth, especially population growth), and for the last half of the century, the continent was dominated by two non-European powers (the Americans and the Russians).  The once dominant European powers were pawns in a Cold War chess match that featured a former colony squaring off against a backward, Communist behemoth.

Rising to the Challenge?

April 30th, 2010 by John Feehery

In 1893, Chicago hosted the World’s Fair, which celebrated the 400th anniversary of Christopher Columbus’s arrival in America.  Designed by Daniel Burnham, the man who said, “Make no little plans, they have no magic to stir man’s blood,” and Frederick Olmsted, the famed landscape architect, the Chicago Columbian Exposition, sent a clear signal to the rest of the world:  Watch out, because America is coming.

A century later, the United States government decided not to fund expositions any more, probably scarred by the memory of the 1984 New Orleans Expo, which is the only Expo to ever go bankrupt.  Everything we do now is paid for by corporate America.

This history all came to my mind as I read the story in today’s Washington Post about the opening of the Shanghai Expo.   The Chinese are taking this event very seriously, as they usually do.  They get the symbolism.

Immigration Reform Compromise

April 29th, 2010 by John Feehery

The new law in Arizona should be seen less through the prism of politics or constitutional law and more through the lens of national psychology.  It really is a cri de coeur, or a cry from the heart.

The law may seem punitive or intrusive from the ACLU’s perspective.  But as I have said before, desperate times require desperate measures.

You only need to glance over the border and see the situation that is unfolding in Mexico to understand that the people of Arizona are panicking that the drug war, like a swarm of killer bees, is coming to a location near them.

Arizonans read stories like this and it makes them rightfully concerned:  “Gunmen killed more than 20 people — eight in one slaying — on Wednesday in one of the bloodiest days of the year. There were multiple shootings outside a nightclub, outside a convenience store and outside an elementary school as the violence flared up with fury. Juárez police reported shootings as the night wore on, but it was not immediately known how many were dead. One news outlet dubbed the event ‘Black Wednesday.’ More than 40 homicides have occurred since Monday despite a heavy presence of federal police and soldiers in the city.”

Desperate Times Call for Desperate Measures

April 26th, 2010 by John Feehery

The Mexican drug war has spilled out over the border in the Southwest and has helped precipitate the new immigration law that just was signed into law in Arizona.

Washington activists can cry out about the unfairness of the law all they want, but until the President and his Administration take seriously the threat posed by the Mexican drug gangs, the people of Arizona will have no choice but to take extreme measures.

70 percent of the people of Arizona support the law just enacted.  That tells you something right there.

Both Arizona and New Mexico were in the top eight most violent states in the union last year.  Most of that can be attributed to the fact that the drug war has spilled out over the border.

I was listening to NPR (the voice of communism as my friends used to call it) and the story I heard was chilling.  The drug gangs now control the illegal passage ways into the United States, and if someone wants to come to America to find their version of the American dream, they can come illegally, which is very unlikely (given the cost and the time involved) or they can cut a deal with the drug lords.  Most cut a deal with the drug lords, and they become a mule for illegal narcotics.

Work Longer, Retire Later

April 24th, 2010 by John Feehery

My wife’s boss, George LeMieux, the junior Senator from Florida, gave me a startling statistic the other day.  He said that he got it from Erskine Bowles, President Clinton’s former chief of staff.

According to LeMieux, the Federal government is taking in roughly 23 trillion in tax revenue, but spending roughly 34 trillion.  That is bad enough, but what is chilling about these numbers is that the 23 trillion that we are taking in only covers the costs of entitlement spending.  Entitlement spending is the money we pay for Social Security, Medicare and the federal portion of the Medicaid programs.

For everything else, including national defense, the State Department, the FAA, etc, we have to borrow money from the Chinese and other generous foreign governments.  How does that little fun fact grab you?  I feel more confident about America’s future, don’t you?

Now Democrats will say that there is an easy way to close this gap:  Raise taxes on the rich.  But if you raised taxes to one-hundred percent on all the rich people, the gap would likely still grow, because when you raise taxes on rich people, you usually get less revenue.