Posts Tagged ‘McCain’

GOP’s Silent Majority

September 27th, 2011 by John Feehery

“And so tonight — to you, the great silent majority of my fellow Americans — I ask for your support.”

In November of 1969, Richard Nixon uttered this line in a televised address to the nation, explaining his plans in Vietnam.

At the time, the nation was enveloped in social, economic and racial turmoil. Nixon was speaking to the folks in the country who were respectful of authority, preferred order to chaos, disdained the revolutionaries and distrusted the intellectual elite who were attacking the pillars of American society.

The silent majority came to mean the white middle and lower middle class of America, and Nixon’s phrase came to be seen as a way to polarize an already polarized society.

But the phrase still has some uses.

The Republican Party has been embroiled in revolution from the so-called Tea Party Patriots.

These Tea Party Republicans were the first to embrace Sarah Palin. They gained inspiration from Glenn Beck back when Beck was the man. They held large protests around the country and on the National Mall. They targeted Republicans in primary fights in the midterm election, and successfully took out Bob Bennett, the senator from Utah; Mike Castle, the favorite to win the Delaware Senate seat; and Lisa Murkowski, the sitting senator from Alaska (who ended up winning the general election in a daring third-party challenge).

Obama and the Catholic Vote

September 19th, 2011 by John Feehery

The Washington Post had this to say about a crucial voting bloc: “American Catholics are the ultimate swing voters, switching between Republicans and Democrats alike. Representing approximately one in four U.S. voters, Catholics make up the largest single religious voting bloc in American politics.”

Catholic voters voted big time for Barack Obama in the last Presidential election, despite the fact that Mr. Obama is staunchly and aggressively pro-choice.

Catholics voted for Mr. Obama over Mr. McCain by a nine-point margin (54 percent versus 45 percent), a turnaround from 2004 when Catholics supported President Bush over Sen. John Kerry, Massachusetts Democrat, by a five-point margin (52 percent to 47 percent).

Politics doesn’t often come in Mass, but it did this past Sunday in the least expected way. Although from the very beginning I should have thought something was up.

The Reagan Library Debate

September 8th, 2011 by John Feehery

Rick Perry walked into an ambush at the Reagan Library last night, as he took hits on his record, on his rhetoric, and on his philosophy.  John Huntsman revived his campaign with a sparkling performance.  Newt Gingrich took on the role of Spiro Agnew by once again attacking the media for asking questions about the differences between the candidates (which I thought was the purpose of the debate).  Michelle Bachmann joined Herman Cain in the irrelevance caucus.  Rick Santorum scored a good hit against Perry, which eliminated his chance to be named to the ticket by the Big Texan.  Ron Paul went where no Republican has gone before on the libertarian scale.

And Mitt Romney won the debate.

The line of the night was Perry’s Ponzi scheme claim, an utterance that will live in infamy in 30-second commercials from every anti-Perry organization on the planet for the next six months.

The second best line came from Romney:  “I don’t want to eliminate Social Security.  I want to save it.”

A Grand Bargain?

July 20th, 2011 by John Feehery

I love when the Senate comes up with a grand bargain. It gets all the Washington insiders excited. The pundits love grand bargains. The media goes crazy over grand bargains.

I remember when the Senate came up with a grand bargain on immigration a couple of years ago. Ted Kennedy and John McCain came together to hammer out a comprehensive approach to fixing our borders and allowing illegal immigrants to apply for citizenship. Mel Martinez (a good guy and my wife’s former boss) went around town talking about how they were going to jam this agreement through the House.

The House balked on immigration and my guess is that they will balk on this latest grand bargain.

It is rare that the Senate can completely jam the House on issues as big as entitlement spending and taxes. As much as it might disdain the lower body, under our Constitution, the Senate cannot unilaterally impose laws without getting the House to pass them too.

Now, on the merits, I think a grand bargain sounds grand.

I agree with the President that we have a unique opportunity to do some common-sense things to cure our debt problems.

Rolling Thunder

May 31st, 2011 by John Feehery

Riding my rented bike through the crowd of motorcyclists over the weekend provoked two thoughts: My bike was no match for their hogs, and my shorts and tee-shirt didn’t quite fit in with their duds.

Every Memorial Day, thousands of bikers from around the country flock to Washington D.C. to pay tribute to those who paid the ultimate sacrifice to protect their country. Quite often, traffic shuts down, which is why I was riding my rented bike.

Most of these bikers play the role of the hard-core motorcycle gang member, with their tattoos and their leather regalia. But it is just a role. When they go back home, in all likelihood, they are just normal middle class Americans.

This year, Sarah Palin joined the party.

She, too, was wearing leather, and she too was playing a role. We just haven’t figured out what that role will be.

If she runs for President, she will be the most macho of the candidates running. She will run to the right of Romney, run to the right of Pawlenty, run to the right of Newt Gingrich and run to the right of Ron Paul.

Obama’s Cruelest Month

September 7th, 2010 by John Feehery

“April is the cruelest month, breeding lilacs out of the dead land, mixing memory and desire, stirring dull roots with spring rain.”  – T.S. Eliot–The Wasteland

Had T.S. Elliot just witnessed the August endured by the Obama Administration, he might have changed his opinion of the cruelest month.  Because, politically, for Democrats, this August has been nothing, but a wasteland.

From the moment Michelle Obama set foot in Spain, to the moment her husband decided to wade into the New York City mosque mess, it has been nothing, but bad news for Congressional Democrats.

As the President’s popularity ratings have sunk, so have the fortunes of his close allies in Capitol Hill.  According to Gallup, Republicans now enjoy the biggest advantage to the following question in the history of the poll:  “Will you vote for the Republican candidate or the Democratic candidate this coming November?”

And in race after race, the polling is not getting any better for the Democrats.   It was widely reported that Democratic operatives have already thrown in the towel on the House, and are now turning their attention to saving the Senate majority, a concern that was deemed unthinkable only four months ago.

Hands in the Cookie Jar

September 16th, 2008 by John Feehery

 

 

            The Obama campaign has tried its darnedest to blame John McCain for the ailing economy.  It’s McCain’s free-market, laissez-fairer, philosophy that is to blame for this collapse, goes the argument. 

 

            A couple of things wrong with this construct, however.

 

            First, McCain is hardly laissez-faire in his approach to regulation.  In fact, if anything, McCain is a trust-buster, in the tradition of his hero, Teddy Roosevelt.  He has taken on big industries, like tobacco, pharmaceuticals, and big oil. 

 

            McCain might have some friends who are lobbyists, but that doesn’t mean that he treats them any differently than anybody else.  He goes after big corporations and industries, especially when he believes that they are not putting the country first.

 

            Second, this crisis is not caused by the free-market.  It is caused by government intrusion and government corruption.

 

            The collapse of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae is a perfect example of what happens when quasi-government entities are given a license to steal.  Basically, these government-sponsored entities used their government guarantees to make risky and increasingly expensive bets with tax payer money.  Those bets were made on the proposition that home prices would continually and forever increase at a rate of 10% or more a year. 

McCain at the Convention

September 5th, 2008 by John Feehery

 

 

            The best part of McCain’s speech last night was the end. 

 

            He finally got the crowd revved up, and his call for change, with the cheering in the background, will make a nice campaign commercial.

 

            The rest of it was only so-so.  He seemed distracted by the protesters (can you imagine the media response if somebody did that to Obama?) and he was not on his game.

 

            But the speech did serve two purposes.

 

            First, it highlighted how magnificent Sarah Palin’s speech really was.  If everybody can hit the back flip on the balance beam perfectly, then it really doesn’t seem like a big deal.  But if only one person can do it, then it seems like a much bigger deal.

 

            Palin was the only one to hit the back flip on the balance beam perfectly out of any of the convention speeches, including Biden and Obama.

 

            She stuck her landing, and her achievement seems all the greater because nobody else could.

 

Getting Conservatives Enthusiastic About McCain

August 24th, 2008 by John Feehery

 

 

            I have an ongoing debate with a couple of my conservative friends about this upcoming election.  I believe that a John McCain victory is essential for our national security.  They believe that an Obama victory would usher in a Republican majority in two quick years.  Don’t worry, they say, Obama will screw it up so bad, we will get the majority back in no time.

 

            There is some precedent for that calculation.  In 1992, George Bush the First lost to Bill Clinton, because conservatives decided to stay home.  Two years later, the conservatives were motivated enough to deliver the first Republican Congress in forty years.

 

            Many polls have noted that there is an enthusiasm gap between the two candidates.  McCain supporters are not nearly as excited about the Republican nominee as Obama supporters are about the junior Senator from Illinois.  Like my unnamed friends, many conservatives will vote for McCain but they won’t be that excited about it.

 

The Great Game Revisited

August 13th, 2008 by John Feehery

 

            Interesting op-ed in the Wall Street Journal today written by Melik Kaylan, a New-York based writer who has reported often from Georgia, entitled “Welcome Back to the Great Game”, gives some important insights into the game that Russia is playing.

 

He points this out:  “Having overestimated the power of the Soviet Union in its last years, we have consistently underestimated the ambitions of Russia since.  Already, a great deal has been said about the implication of Russia’s invasion for Ukraine, the Baltic States and Europe generally.  But few have noticed the direct strategic threat to U.S. efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan.  The Kremlin is not about to reignite the Cold War for the love of a few thousand Ossetians or even for its animosity toward five million Georgians.  This is calculated strategic maneuvering.  And make no mistake, it’s about countering U.S. power at its furthest stretch with Moscow’s power very close to home.”