Posts Tagged ‘Dick Cheney’
June 15th, 2011 by John Feehery
It took awhile, but the Cold War consensus is finally shattering.
The Cold War consensus centered around a basic proposition: America was going to both pay and provide the military might to insure the national security of the free world.
America founded NATO as the alliance to promote that security and Congress paid for a national security establishment that guaranteed the dominance of American troops.
That Cold War consensus obviously started at the conclusion of the Second World War, survived both Korea and Vietnam, teetered a bit during the Carter years, and then came back strong during the Reagan years. After the Soviet Union fell apart, it took a while for the Cold War consensus to gain its bearings and its true raison d’etre.
The collapse of Yugoslavia gave the Cold War consensus a shot in the arm, as NATO rushed to the rescue of the Serbian Muslims. George Bush browbeat the alliance in helping with the War on Terror, as the Cold War consensus stretched beyond its natural life.
The war on terror is winding down. We will be out of Iraq before the next election and we may be out of Afghanistan if Congress has anything to say about it. Read more...
Tags: afghanistan, America, American troops, Cold War, Congress, Conservatives, Dick Cheney, Economy, election, foriegn wars, George Bush, Korea, NATO, Politics, Reagan, Republican, Ron Paul, Second World War, Secretary Gates, Soviet Union, spending, United States Congress, Vietnam, war, Yugoslavia
Posted in Education, Financial Crisis, Foreign Relations, Government, History, Politics, Promises, Theory, election, middle-east, spending, taxes, terrorism, tragedy, war | 2 Comments »
March 22nd, 2011 by John Feehery

Rebel fighters gesture in front of a burning vehicle belonging to forces loyal to Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi after an air strike by coalition forces along a road between Benghazi and Ajdabiyah.
President Obama says that Libyan strongman Muamar Gaddafi “has to go.”
The question that pops up in my mind is: “Go where?”
I don’t think our President has an answer for that question. I think the President is winging it.
The Administration did a good job of getting the Arab League to agree to let us start bombing Libya. They did a pretty good job of getting the U.N. to look the other way.
They forgot one crucial group, though: the Congress.
It seems to me that making sure that the folks who are paying the bills would be clued into this latest foray into the Arab world.
The Obama Administration is taking the position that Dick Cheney took in the run-up to the first Gulf War: it doesn’t need Congressional authorization.
But the first President Bush rejected Cheney’s advice and sought Congress’s stamp of approval before launching Operation Desert Storm in 1991. Read more...
Tags: American people, Arab League, Congress, Dick Cheney, Libya, Muamar Gaddafi, Obama Administration, President Bush, President Obama, U.N., war in Libya
Posted in Bad Decisions, Foreign Relations, Government, History, Politics, Theory, national security, war | No Comments »
May 19th, 2010 by John Feehery

Rand Paul / Photo Credit: Gage Skidmore
Rand Paul’s election may very well mean the beginning of the end of the neo-conservative movement in the Republican Party. It also might mark the beginning of the end of the social conservative wing of the Republican Party.
During the nomination process of the Presidential election two years ago, I wrote about the impact of the Ron Paul insurgency and its potential impact. Paul was a fundraising sensation, and he had a cadre of committed followers who believed profoundly that the Federal Government had grown too big, had become too intrusive, had gone to war for all the wrong reasons, and was too involved in the daily lives of the American people.
Paul went after some pretty significant sacred cows in the Republican orthodoxy. He thought the Iraq War was stupid, and that our foreign policy presence in the Middle East was a big reason why we were attacked on 9/11. He thinks that the war on drugs is a waste of time, and that if people want to smoke pot, well, that is up to them. He thinks that the security apparatus of the United States makes America more of a police state and should be down-sized dramatically. Read more...
Tags: Dick Cheney, George Bush, Grover Norquist, Karl Rove, Kentucky, national security conservatives, neo-conservative, Primary elections, Rand Paul, Republican, Republicans, Ron Paul, social conservatives, vote
Posted in GOP, Government, Politics, Theory, election | No Comments »
April 12th, 2010 by John Feehery
The Republican Party has traditionally been seen as a party of two parts: a moderate wing and a conservative wing. But that view has become less and less relevant as the moderate wing shrinks to a party of basically two people (Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins).
It would be easy to then make the conclusion that the Republican Party is chiefly a conservative party – now that the moderates have fled – and that its views are monolithic and homogenous. Of course, nothing can be further from the truth.
Indeed, the conservative movement speaks with many voices. Here is a rundown of the many strains conservatism:
Sarah Palin Conservatism: Palin is an anti-intellectual conservative, as Richard Hofstadter, the left-wing historian, might have put it. Although she may not know it, she inherits a proud legacy of populist conservatives, those who disparage the East-Coast elite, who gain more energy by attacking the media, who don’t need to read books (other than the Bible) to gain wisdom. In many ways, she is a conventional conservative in her embrace of traditional values, of gun-owner rights, of smaller government, lower taxes, and less regulations. But what makes her unique is her ability to garner media attention, no matter what she says or what she does. And the more the media attacks her, the more support she gains. Read more...
Tags: Bill Kristol, Conservatism, Dick Cheney, election, George W Bush, George Wallace, Mike Huckabee, Mitt Romney, Pat Buchanan, Ron Paul, Sarah Palin, Teddy Roosevelt
Posted in GOP, Theory, election | No Comments »