Posts Tagged ‘Senate’

Revenge Best Served Cold

March 26th, 2010 by John Feehery

Republicans can learn much from Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

When a bipartisan majority in the House and the Senate passed the prescription drug benefit in 2003 (after a painful three and a half hour vote on the Conference report), Pelosi, who was then Minority Leader, promised immediately to repeal the legislation.

Democrats even briefly toyed with using that as one of their campaign themes, but it got lost in a Presidential campaign that focused mostly on national security and John Kerry’s flip-flopping ways.

But that didn’t mean that Mrs. Pelosi forgot about her pledge.

This health care reform package is notable for many reasons.  It took a long time to get done.  It spends a lot of money.  It will immediately raise premiums.  It promises to give better access to health insurance to those with pre-existing conditions.  It makes people who don’t want to buy or can’t afford to buy health insurance buy it anyway.

And it repeals two parts of the original and most offensive (from Pelosi’s perspective) portions of the bill.  It destroys the Medicare Advantage program, which Democrats irrationally feared would lead to the privatization of the Medicare program.  And it makes the prescription drug companies fill in the so-called donut hole, which was put in place to keep the original bill within its budget parameters.

The Corrupt Bargain

March 16th, 2010 by John Feehery

In 1824, the House of Representatives awarded the Presidency to John Quincy Adams after Henry Clay, who was then the House Speaker, concluded that he wouldn’t be President and cut a deal that landed him the job of Secretary of State.

It seemed like a good deal for Adams and a good deal for Clay.  But to supporters of Andrew Jackson, America’s first true populist leader, this was a “corrupt bargain”, a sign of a decadent and untrustworthy political process, and a rallying cry for a new class of American voters.

The “corrupt bargain” would haunt both Adams and Clay for the rest of their careers.  Adams became only the second one-term President (the first was his father), losing easily to Jackson in 1828.  Clay, although he would prove to be the most powerful Speaker in history, would never become President.

Congressional Democrats are now embarking on their own version of the “corrupt bargain”.   House Democrats have dreamed up a parliamentary device to vote on a health care bill that will become the law of the land (for how long, nobody really knows), without actually ever voting on it.

Can the House trust the Senate? (From CNN)

March 12th, 2010 by John Feehery

Washington (CNN) — When the Founding Fathers decided to create a bicameral legislative branch, they were trying to make things difficult for the federal government to grab power from the people.

What the Founding Fathers may not have foreseen was how much the House and the Senate would grow to dislike and distrust each other. Why is this important now? Democrats in the House may have to take the political risk of voting to pass the health care bill based on assurances from the Senate that the upper chamber will eventually modify the law to change some things House Democrats don’t want.

I live a bipartisan household. I am a creature of the House, having spent 15 years toiling as a Republican staffer in the lower chamber. My wife is a Senate girl, having spent about the same amount of time as a Republican staffer in the upper chamber. Talk about Mars and Venus.

When you are working for the House majority, you worry less about the tactics of the minority and more about the workings of an inscrutable Senate. Former Speaker Tip O’Neill reportedly once said to a Democratic colleague: “Remember, the House Republicans are merely the opposition. The Senate is the enemy.”

Life is Complicated For Speaker Pelosi

March 6th, 2010 by John Feehery

The resignation of Congressman Eric Massa complicates the life of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.  And her life is already pretty complicated.

Of course, it means one less vote for a health care bill that Congressional Democrats are trying to get through a reluctant House.

And one vote is a big deal, because it looks like pro-life Democrats aren’t going to swallow what the Senate passed late last year.

The Democrats have constructed a complicated scheme to pass health care, overly complicated in my view.  The House has to somehow pass a Senate bill that includes a huge new tax increase on labor union health plans and abortion language that is still unacceptable to Bart Stupak.

Then they are going to pass another follow-on bill that will somehow reverse that labor union tax with so-called “reconciliation” instructions that the Senate then will theoretically take up and pass with 51 votes.

But first, the Senate has to hope that the Senate parliamentarian decides that whatever the House passes somehow fits in with the Senate rules, not a certain proposition.

And if the Parliamentarian decides that it is not kosher, well, then, Joe Biden has to step in and create a new precedent that will give the Republicans ample cause to shut the Upper Chamber down for a while.

GOP Winning Coast to Coast

March 2nd, 2010 by John Feehery

In the last two Congressional elections, Republicans took it on the chin.  They were decimated in New York; they took terrible blows in Indiana and some big hits in Florida.  They lost seats they should have won in Alabama (of all places).  The carnage stretched all to way to Idaho, Washington, Oregon and, of course California.

It was one long, electoral tidal wave.  Some thought these were transformative elections, that the Democrats were now the majority party for the foreseeable future.

But as often happens in politics, things change and the tidal wave that swept the Democrats into power is starting to recede.

I haven’t met all of the contenders, but I have met a few, and I have been impressed by their passion, their commitment to this country, and their ability to win.

For example, I met earlier this week with Randy Altschuler.  Altschuler is running against Democrat Tim Bishop of Long Island, New York.  Bishop represents a seat that tends to blow with the political winds.  During the Eisenhower years, it was Republican.  During the Johnson and Nixon years, it was Democrat.  During Reagan, it was Republican.  For the first Bush and Clinton years, it was Democrat again, and during the Republican revolution in 1994, it swung back to the GOP.  Michael Forbes continued this trend by being first a Republican and then a Democrat.  Felix Grucci beat Forbes, and then improbably, after running the worst campaign in history, lost to Bishop.

Tom Coburn

July 28th, 2008 by John Feehery

 

            When I worked in the House Republican leadership and Tom Coburn was a member of the House, I didn’t like his style of politics.  He seemed unreasonable.  He held up legislation.  He made us work weekends.  He led revolts against the leadership time and time again.  He was inconvenient.

 

            Now that he is a member of the Senate and I am back in the private sector, paying taxes and worrying about the debt, my view of Coburn has changed.  I love the guy.

 

            Coburn takes his job seriously.  He makes his staff actually read the bills.  He has a simple rule.  If a politician proposes a new law, he demands that the politician also examine what went wrong with the old law.  No new laws until we get rid of the old law that hasn’t worked.  Makes sense to me.    Since most laws and programs coming from Washington are wasteful and duplicative, it seems like a reasonable position to take.  But not inside the beltway.

 

            But as everbody knows, it is much easier to start a government program than it is to end a government program.  Coburn estimates that the federal government wastes $300 billion a year on programs that don’t work.

Ignorance Is Not Bliss

June 6th, 2008 by John Feehery

Ignorance Is Not Bliss

 

            I was talking to a high-ranking Republican Senate aide last night and he was telling me about his latest trip to Iraq.  He talked about the Iranian missiles that were a constant threat to the Green Zone, the fact that Baghdad was still a very dangerous place, and the wisps of hope about the future, how oil revenues are starting to pile up, how Iraq actually has a budget surplus, and how the institutions of government are starting to churn slowly.

 

            I asked him who went on the trip and he told me it was a group of Republican staffers like himself.  I asked him why Democratic staffers didn’t go, and he told me that they were invited but that they all declined.

 

            He then told me about a briefing where high level Pentagon officials came to the Capitol to brief Senators and their staffs.  Again, the Democrats were invited and again they didn’t show.

 

            Apparently, these staff are taking their cues from Senator Obama, who hasn’t been to Iraq in years, and who has only reluctantly conceded that visiting there might be useful.