Posts Tagged ‘RUSH LIMBAUGH’

Tea Party Fantasy Date

December 15th, 2011 by John Feehery

Rush Limbaugh said today that any Republican in the field, other than Ron Paul, could beat Barack Obama today.

That is not true, and Rush should know it.

Rush does not have a particularly good track record.  Remember, he believed that Christine O’Donnell could be Chris Coons, that Sharron Angle could beat Harry Reid, that Joe Miller could beat whoever the Democrat was in Alaska and that Ken Buch could beat whoever was running for the Senate in Colorado.

He was wrong then and he is wrong now.

Michele Bachmann cannot beat Barack Obama.  Rick Santorum cannot beat Barack Obama (no matter how much I like him).  Hermann Cain could not beat Barack Obama.

Rick Perry cannot beat Barack Obama.  I know it might be tempting for conservatives to believe that Perry could magically come back and beat the President, but there is no evidence that he would do any better in the debates than he has already.  Obama would wipe him out.

Newt Gingrich will not be able to beat Barack Obama.  As much as we might wish it to be true, it will not happen.  Newt will say something controversial, and he will have the same approval ratings that he had when he was Speaker.  Those approval ratings were terrible.

Stop the Circular Firing Squad

November 3rd, 2011 by John Feehery

Ronald Reagan used to invoke the 11th Commandment to get Republicans to stop attacking one another.

Those days are over.

Republicans now seem to take special interest in whacking each other with extra vigor.

The Herman Cain campaign has made the tactical decision that instead of owning up to the facts surrounding Mr. Cain’s sexual harassment problems, that it would be a far better decision to blame the Rick Perry campaign for helping Politico break the story.

The Perry campaign is trying to shift the blame to the Romney campaign.

The Romney campaign is wisely keeping its mouth shut, hoping upon hope that this Cain story stays in the news for a couple of more weeks.

It is painful to see how the Cain campaign has handled this communications crisis.  Actually, it is a very valuable learning experience for anybody who wants an example of how not to communicate in a crisis.

It is more painful to see how Republicans are spending so much time in a circular firing squad, making Barack Obama’s road back to the White House a tad bit easier.

The Power of One

July 25th, 2011 by John Feehery

It is awfully hard to comprehend what happened in Norway over the weekend.

How could one man do so much damage in the name of Christianity?

How could that one man be so completely delusional to think that by killing so many innocent lives that he was fulfilling some greater mission?

Anders Behring Breivik shot dead 68 young people on Utoya Island right after he set off explosives that killed eight in downtown Oslo. According to news reports, Breivik, a blond hair blue-eyed native Norwegian, wanted to save Europe from cultural Marxism and from Muslim immigration. He apparently went on the shooting spree because he wanted to send a signal to the ruling Labor Party as a way to punish it for its lax policies on immigration.

Breivik, with more than a hint of irony, quoted the father of utilitarianism, John Stuart Mill, saying, “One person with a belief is equal to the force of 100,000 who have only interests.” Of course, it was Mill who helped to design the principle of no harm, which, according to Wikpedia, “holds that each individual has the right to act as he wants, so long as these actions do not harm others. If the action is self-regarding, that is, if it only directly affects the person undertaking the action, then society has no right to intervene, even if it feels the actor is harming himself.”

Russell Weston, Jared Lee Loughner and Political Civility

January 10th, 2011 by John Feehery

On July 24th, 1998, just as the House of Representatives concluded debate on contentious health care legislation, Russell Weston stepped into the Capitol building, fired a gun, killing Officer Jacob Chestnut. He then proceeded into the office of Majority Whip Tom DeLay, where he encountered Detective John Gibson. Gibson was able to wound Weston and stop him from killing others in the Whip’s office (including me), but not without sacrificing his own life in the process.

Weston was a deranged psychotic who held strong anti-government views. Perhaps because his target was a strong conservative leader, there was no deep concern at the time about the political rhetoric of the day. There was only concern about the alarming lack of security that surrounded the Capitol grounds, and about the fact that two brave men had given their lives in defense of their country.

The attack on Gabrielle Giffords brought back memories of that dark day thirteen years ago. Unfortunately for Giffords, she didn’t have security to separate her from a mentally unstable person who would target her for murder. She wasn’t in the Capitol. She was back in her district, doing the kinds of things that Members of Congress are supposed to do: Meeting with her constituents, answering questions and being responsive to their concerns and desires.

Rude, Nude and Crazy?

March 9th, 2010 by John Feehery

Last week, Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charlie Rangel had to step down because he had been bedeviled by ethics problems, including a failure to pay his taxes.  That wasn’t the direct reason he stepped down, but it wasn’t just his little junket to the Caribbean that ended his tax-writing career.

Nancy Pelosi, the House Speaker, tried to install her fellow Californian Pete Stark in Rangel’s place, but the rest of the Democratic Caucus, sensing that perhaps putting a crazy person in charge of the most powerful committee in Congress, told Pete to pack it in.  They decided to go instead with Sander Levin, who isn’t very exciting, but certainly isn’t crazy.

Late last week, rumors started flowing about the imminent resignation of an obscure New York Congressman, a guy named Eric Massa.  Massa was most notable for being a Democrat who voted against most of President Obama’s agenda.

Massa, who apparently got drunk at one of his staffer’s weddings and then made a complete ass out of himself, found out the hard way about the wonderful world of Washington.

Are Tea-Partiers Really Conservative?

March 5th, 2010 by John Feehery

I hate it when David Brooks writes a column on a subject that I have been researching on and planning to write about for weeks.  And he did it to me this morning, with a great column about “The Wall Mart Hippies” (http://budurl.com/2r5v).

His central thesis is that tea-party crowd is not really conservative at all.  “Both the New Left and the Tea Party movement are radically anticonservative. Conservatism is built on the idea of original sin — on the assumption of human fallibility and uncertainty. To remedy our fallen condition, conservatives believe in civilization — in social structures, permanent institutions and just authorities, which embody the accumulated wisdom of the ages and structure individual longings.  That idea was rejected in the 1960s by people who put their faith in unrestrained passion and zealotry. The New Left then, like the Tea Partiers now, had a legitimate point about the failure of the ruling class. But they ruined it through their own imprudence, self-righteousness and naïve radicalism. The Tea Partiers will not take over the G.O.P., but it seems as though the ’60s political style will always be with us — first on the left, now the right.”