Posts Tagged ‘Republican’

Rubio and the Hispanic Vote

October 21st, 2011 by John Feehery

Marco Rubio

Chris Matthews thought he would get me with his question on Marco Rubio. He asked me, breaking news style, what I thought about the revelations that Rubio’s family fled Cuba two whole years before Castro came to power.

I didn’t scratch my head on camera, but I did so in my mind.

What the hell is the big deal, I thought.

Not knowing a thing about this “breaking story”, I didn’t give much of an answer. I mumbled something about Rubio being a rising star in the party and then the segment ended.

But having read the story this morning, I have a better sense of what is going on here.

The Democrats are desperately afraid that Mitt Romney is going to pick Rubio to be his Vice Presidential candidate, and they are getting the Washington Post to do its bidding.

I don’t know if Romney is going to pick Rubio and I don’t know if Rubio would accept such an offer (he says he won’t), but I do know that the R and R ticket would spell the doom of Mr. Obama and his ill-fated administration.

Bain Capital

September 28th, 2011 by John Feehery

I was talking to a Democratic friend of mine this morning, and he told me to expect the President’s people to go after Mitt Romney on the jobs issue.  “There is a lot more that hasn’t come to the surface,” he told me confidently.

I’m sure there is.  There is always more on just about everybody.  I wish we knew more about Obama before the American people elected him three years ago.

The issue that my friend talked to me about had to do with Romney’s time at Bain Capital.

Bain Capital is a private equity firm that buys undervalued companies and turns them around so they can become profitable.  They have had a lot of success.  You can wake up with a Bain Capital company (Sealy), check out the weather (they own the Weather Channel), get a cup of coffee and a donut (Dunkin Donuts), go to the store and buy some running shoes to work off the donut (Sports Authority), buy some office supplies (Staples), grab a burger (Burger King), buy a present (Brookstone), catch a movie (AMC Entertainment), and then get home in time for dinner (Domino’s Pizza).

Ping-Pong

September 26th, 2011 by John Feehery

Ping-Pong is a wonderful game, requiring skill, finesse, great hand-eye coordination, and at times, power.

Ping-Pong is a different game in the Congressional sense.

When one legislative body ping-pongs back a piece of legislation to another legislative body (like the House jamming the Senate) it can be both exhilarating and frustrating at the same time.

Last week, the House served up a continuing resolution plus some additional disaster assistance money to the Senate before leaving for its break for the Jewish holidays.

The Senate, which hoped to also break for the week, is not at all happy with what the House served up.

But to be successful in jamming back the House, the Senate has to act as one. The rules of the Senate make it awfully hard for that body to act quickly on anything if there is a disagreement between the political parties.

And on this package, there is intense disagreement.

The Republicans want to pay for disaster assistance. The Democrats don’t like how the Republicans paid for it, especially their efforts to isolate a particularly bad political scandal that is currently afflicting the Obama Administration.

Fighting Fraud In Medicare

September 16th, 2011 by John Feehery

“In such condition, there is no place for industry; because the fruit thereof is uncertain: and consequently no culture of the earth; no navigation, nor use of the commodities that may be imported by sea; no commodious building; no instruments of moving, and removing, such things as require much force; no knowledge of the face of the earth; no account of time; no arts; no letters; no society; and which is worst of all, continual fear, and danger of violent death; and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.”

That was Thomas Hobbes, who argued that implicit in civil society is a social contract that called for a strong government presence in regulating conduct.  In Mr. Hobbes time, the king was the ultimate sovereign.  These days, you could argue that the sovereign is the Federal government as set out by the Constitution.

Hobbes understood that the nature of man, without that social contract, would descend into chaos and ultimately darkness.  In other words, without strong laws, people cheat, lie and steal.

I say this as a means of introduction to a bipartisan proposal by Jim Gerlach, a Republican from Pennsylvania, and Earl Blumenauer, a Democrat from Oregon, to get rid of fraud in Medicare.  It is a modest proposal that could save tens of billions of dollars in government spending.

No Need To Respond

September 7th, 2011 by John Feehery

Ev and Gerry started the whole response thing.

Everett Dirksen and Gerry Ford, the former Senate Republican leader from Illinois and the former House Minority Leader (and later President) from Michigan used to have a radio show broadcast from the Capitol.

They turned that radio show into a televised rebuttal to President Johnson’s 1966 State of the Union Address.

Dirksen, with his mop of white hair, and Ford, with his bald pate, must have been quite a sight in the years leading up to the Age of Aquarius. Dirksen was the one who famously said, “a billion here, and a billion there, and pretty soon you are talking real money.”

I could understand the frustration of the two Republican (and minority) leaders. Lyndon Johnson wasn’t much to tell the truth, and Republicans at the start of 1966 didn’t have any legislative power. Dirksen, a genius when it came to the political communication innovation, probably dreamed up the idea of a joint response, and a new idea was born: Let’s tell our side of the story.

Perry and Romney

August 19th, 2011 by John Feehery

For a lot of non-Tea Party Republicans, Rick Perry’s entrance into the Republican Primary makes Mitt Romney look a lot more attractive.

It is wrong to say that the Republican establishment wants Mitt Romney to be their Presidential candidate. First, that assumes that there is a Republican establishment that can make a decision, which I think is a vast overstatement. Second, if there were such an establishment, it is a non-evangelical elite that is simply not that comfortable with Romney’s Mormonism, and has been casting a wide-net for anybody other than Romney and Bachmann. Some had put their hopes in Pawlenty, others begged Haley Barbour, Mitch Daniels, Chris Christie and Jeb Bush to enter the race, to no avail, and now they are turning their attention to Paul Ryan, which will probably yield the same results.

At this moment, it now looks that the choice comes between Perry and Romney. Michele Bachmann, whether she knew it or not, was always a placeholder for Perry, and my guess is that she will quickly fade in the polls.

The Tea Party Takes It on the Chin

August 2nd, 2011 by John Feehery

John Boehner won a complete and total victory in the House with an overwhelming vote to extend the debt limit.

His victory was so complete, many of his closest allies in the House could safely vote no to avoid primary fights next year.

House Democrats divided almost exactly in half, and their left wing is livid at the deal cut by the President.

The Tea Party, the rambunctious group of mostly second and third term members (and more than a few freshman) could only look on in anger and despair. They looked liked fools, their demands unrealistic, their rhetoric unnecessarily heated, their performance disappointing not only to their base, but also to Republican establishmentarians like me.

They demanded that the Senate pass a balanced budget amendment, but had to settle merely for a vote, a request that Harry Reid, the Senate Majority leader was more than happy to grant, over the grimace of Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell.

Imagine how hard it has been for McConnell to explain to Jim DeMint how he is trying to take back the Senate and that giving Reid a chance to give his moderates cover to vote yes on the balanced budget amendment only hurts the cause.

Reunion

August 1st, 2011 by John Feehery

As we were driving back from the airport, my 5-year old son Jack asked me, “Daddy, what’s the debt limit?”

We had just flown in from Chicago. I had dropped off my son at grandma’s house, and drove up to Milwaukee for my 25 year college reunion.

The debt limit wasn’t just on the mind of my 5-year old. It was also on the mind of many of my friends and some other folks who I didn’t even know.

In the hotel coffee shop Sunday morning, the topic of conversation between two 50-year reunion participants was whether they had a deal on the debt limit or not.

They weren’t asking me. They were talking (loudly) among themselves. Their mood was more than a bit grim and frustrated.

At the reunion, my old classmates mostly traded old war stories and tried to remember who did what crazy thing when. It is amazing we all survived our college years (well, most of us survived at least).

When I first arrived on campus close to 30 years ago, Ronald Reagan was in his first term and the economy wasn’t doing very well. Reagan had an abiding sense of optimism and a hatred of communism, neither of which played particularly well with many of my college professors.

Boehner Is In Fine Shape

July 27th, 2011 by John Feehery

John Boehner is doing an exceptional job as Speaker under extraordinarily tough times.

When I first started working in Congress, Tom Foley had just taken over from Jim Wright as Speaker of the House.  Unlike the dictatorial Wright, Foley ran a decentralized process that gave too much power to Committee barons like Dan Rostenkowski, Jack Brooks and John Dingell.

Foley could never quite get the Chairmen to work together enough to overcome their jurisdictional squabbles, and Democrats faltered under the House Bank scandal, the Post Office debacle and a series of other damaging revelations about a Congress that was out of control.

When Newt Gingrich came to the Speaker’s Office, he leap-frogged over the gentlemanly Bob Michel (my former boss) who unfortunately announced his retirement before he could see the promised land of a Republican majority.  Gingrich learned the lessons of the ineffective Foley, centralized power in his chambers, and bull-rushed an ambitious Contract with America legislative agenda.  Along the way, Gingrich alienated some of the new Freshmen, his committee Chairmen, and some key members of the leadership, so much so that a few of them launched a failed coup against the embattled Speaker.

Bad Reason, Good Reason

July 21st, 2011 by John Feehery

Bad reason: Opposing the grand bargain because you think a grand bargain would help President Obama get re-elected.

Good reason: Opposing the grand bargain because you think raising taxes will hurt the economy.

Bad reason: You strongly support a tax increase because you want to stick it to Republicans.

Good reason: You want to get rid of tax breaks and loopholes because you think it will help create jobs and make the economy stronger.

Bad reason: Taking a pledge to not raise taxes because you want to get Grover Norquist off your back.

Good reason: Deciding to take only one pledge – the pledge to defend and protect the Constitution, because you think that a politician who can’t think for himself and use his best judgment shouldn’t be elected in the first place.

Bad reason: You want to cut spending because you want to stick it to poor people who should be working hard just like you do.

Good reason: You want to cut back on spending because you believe that in the long run, if we don’t scale back our government spending, our nation could face financial ruin.