Posts Tagged ‘Jobs’

Protest

October 5th, 2011 by John Feehery

Apparently, Radiohead couldn’t get its schedule straight with the Occupy Wall Street protesters and they didn’t play for the grungy crowd last week. I am not hip enough to know exactly what kind of music the band plays, but I do know that a couple of years ago, the members of the band came up with a brilliant marketing strategy to sell one of its albums. “Pay what you want or pay nothing at all if that is what you want to do.” The band never released how much money it made by letting its fans name their own price, but they chose to not pursue the same strategy for their next album.

Despite the scheduling snafu, Radiohead still has endorsed the protest movement that seems to be gaining strength every day. For example, all of the government employee unions are now on board with Michael Moore and assorted other left-wing radicals to protest the money that Wall Street financiers make every day.

These Wall Street financiers and their other colleagues, known collectively by the collectivists as “the rich” or the “one-percenters”, pay about 30 to 35% of the taxes collected by the Federal government. Having the government employee unions protest against these prodigious tax-payers is somewhat akin to the protesting against the goose because he is not producing golden eggs fast enough.

Zero

September 2nd, 2011 by John Feehery

According to Wikipedia, Labor Day has traditionally been the last time it is fashionable for ladies to wear white. This weekend, it might be the time that President Obama starts waving the white flag of surrender.

Labor Day was born out of conflict. Grover Cleveland signed legislation making Labor Day a holiday in 1884 six days after the Pullman strike ended. Cleveland signed it as a peace offering to the labor movement, which was still pretty raw after the national strike where Federal troops were called in and 13 strikers were killed.

This history remains relevant today.

The Labor Department announced today that the American economy created zero jobs in August. Zero. That hasn’t happened since the end of the Second World War – September of 1945 – when people were so busy celebrating the defeat of the Japanese that they didn’t have time to create any jobs.

Some economists are saying that the dreary job numbers were caused, in part, by the debate over the debt ceiling. I find that hard to believe.

There are plenty of other reasons, including the actions of both this President and of the labor movement.

Billion Here, Billion There

February 10th, 2011 by John Feehery

It was Everett Dirksen who once said, “a billion here, a billion there…pretty soon you are talking real money.”

That may have been true back in the 60’s, when the Illinois Senator was leading the Republican Caucus in the Upper Chamber.

But in the context of a 1.3 trillion dollar deficit, cutting a billion here and a billion there ain’t going to get the job done.

It is no secret that America is going broke. We have a 14 trillion dollar debt that shows no signs of getting any smaller. And the more we owe, the more we pay interest on what we owe.

Republicans have taken the first whacks at the budget by promising to cut anywhere from 30 to 100 billion dollars in this year’s discretionary budget.

Those cuts have caused and will cause outrage in many parts of the country. There will be groups that come to the Hill and plea with their local representatives to stop the cuts. There will be protests and online petitions and commercials and grassroots and grasstops, and all kinds of other ways to try to stop the spending cuts.

Old School, Old Style

January 21st, 2011 by John Feehery

The Bears play the Packers in the NFC championship.

They won’t play in a dome. They won’t play in balmy weather. And they won’t play nice.

They will be in the bitter cold, probably with a good deal of snow, a lot of grunting and a lot of hitting.

It will be old school football, bringing back memories of George Halas and Vince Lombardi.

This will be the first time in the modern era that the Bears have played the Packers in the playoffs. They played each other in the 1940s, but that was when there wasn’t an AFC.

I think there is an AFC championship game, too, but nobody cares about that.

The Bears-Packers match up is the game that people want to watch, because it brings back memories of the old style of football. It also brings back memories of a more nostalgic time in America, when our nation wasn’t going completely broke, when people had jobs, when our country kicked ass and took names.

Now, the past always looks better, more comforting than the future, chiefly because we all somehow survived the old days. And I am sure that back in the 1950’s and 1960’s, when the Bears and the Packers were in their heyday, there were all kinds of things that went wrong with our country.

That’s Where the Money Is

June 9th, 2010 by John Feehery

Heavily borrowing from a principle first employed by Willie Sutton, an infamous bank robber, Senate Democrats are pushing through an obscure tax provision that will accomplish pretty much the same goal:  Stealing money from productive members of society because that is where the money is.

The provision is called carried interest, and it is targeted at people who do their business primarily through business partnerships.

I am not in any way an expert on tax law.  It makes my head spin.  The tax code is so intricate, so detailed, so built for those who can afford to hire tax attorneys, that for most normal people, it is well beyond comprehension.

That is why I turn to smart guys like Doug Holtz-Eakin, the former Congressional Budget Office Director, who can help me make sense of what politicians are trying to do to take more money away from taxpayers.  And Doug has put together an illuminating paper on the unintended consequences (or perhaps intended consequences, I can never tell with these Democrats), of the new carried interest tax proposal being currently debating as part of a tax extenders bill that is on the floor of the Senate (http://americanactionforum.org/files/TaxTreatmentCarriedInterest.pdf).  The impact on the economy is most likely going to be negative.  Most who are in partnerships now will likely hire lawyers who will find ways to do business without being subject to this new tax.

The Glove Fits

March 31st, 2010 by John Feehery

So, according to various news reports, House Energy and Commerce Chairman Henry Waxman is going to “investigate” corporate America for reacting to the President’s new health care law by promising to take huge tax write-downs because of the expected negative impact of the law on their bottom lines.

This kind of reminds me of when O.J. Simpson decided to launch an “investigation” into who killed his wife.

Who killed the jobs, Mr. Waxman?

You did.  And no matter how you try to shift the blame, you can’t escape that truth.

According to the Daily Caller, “Rep. Henry Waxman demanded that AT&T, Verizon, Caterpillar, and Deere & Co. justify their claims about the “costs the companies plan to book related to the new health-care law.” According to Business Week, “Dallas-based AT&T said in a regulatory filing yesterday it would record $1 billion of costs, the most of any U.S. company so far.  AT&T previously received a tax-free benefit from the government to subsidize health-care costs for retirees. Under the new bill, AT&T will no longer be able to deduct that subsidy.”

Republicans on the House Ways and Means Committee put out a couple of fun facts about the terrible impact of this legislation on job creation.