Posts Tagged ‘Jack Abramoff’

Careful What You Write

April 28th, 2010 by John Feehery

Martin Michael Lomasney, a Boston politician from the 19th Century, once said: “”Never write if you can speak; never speak if you can nod; never nod if you can wink.”

Being from Chicago, I was taught that lesson by more a few political types.  The Washington corollary to that admonition is:  “Never write down anything that you wouldn’t be happy to see on the front page of the Washington Post.”

I bet you that the fabulous Fab, the Goldman Sachs wunderkind, Fabrice Tourre, wish he would have remembered those golden nuggets of advice.

It was the fabulous Fab who wrote in an email:  “The whole building is about to collapse any time now.  Only potential survivor, the fabulous Fab . . . standing in the middle of all these complex, highly leveraged, exotic trades he created without necessarily understanding all of the implications of those monstrosities!!!”

That Fab is a cad goes without doubt.

But he isn’t the only one who failed to heed the advice of fabulous Martin Michael Lomasney.

Think of Tiger Woods.  If he wasn’t text crazy, there would be no reason for his wife Elin to beat him with a seven iron, because Elin would have been none the wiser.  No text, no bruise, no crash, no rehab, no problem.

Getting Caught in The Changing Times

March 3rd, 2010 by John Feehery

“The times, they are a changing.”

That anthem of the 60’s should always be in the minds of all Hill ethics counselors.

Charlie Rangel’s troubles with the Ethics Committee follow a familiar path.

I remember well in November of 1994, when an obscure challenger named Michael Patrick Flanagan knocked off a powerful Ways and Means Chairman who had delivered billions of dollars back to his hometown of Chicago.

Before 1992, Dan Rostenkowski’s picture was right next to the definition of power-broker in the Congressional dictionary.  Two years later, his picture was next to the word “crook”.

Rosty did what he had always done.  He used his office as a way to get a little extra money for his family.  The particular crime he was charged with was cashing in the stamps that his office had bought and using the money for his own personal pleasure.

It was penny-ante stuff.  Minor corruption with a little bit of legal graft.

But after the downfall of Jim Wright, what passed for minor graft no longer passed the muster in the country or the media.

Everybody loves Charlie Wilson now – thanks to the book and the movie — but Wilson’s antics wouldn’t have survived in this ethics environment today.