Posts Tagged ‘doug holtz eakin’

What We Can Learn from the Greeks

June 10th, 2010 by John Feehery

Greece / Photo credit: Ulamm

In actuality, there isn’t much in common between the United States and the Greeks.

That was the conclusion of a distinguished panel of economists hosted by the American Action Forum and led by former CBO director Doug Holtz-Eakin.

But if we don’t get our act together soon, things could get steadily worse for the economy and for the American people, and while we probably won’t default on our debt (because we can always print more money), it won’t be very pleasant around here unless we start making some fundamental changes

Senator Judd Gregg, a longtime deficit hawk and current ranking member of the upper chamber’s Budget Committee, keynoted the forum, wryly pointing out in his presentation that western Democracies founded on the Scottish Enlightenment philosophy of free market capitalism and representative government (which, of course, would include the UK, the US, and Japan) are having the hardest time dealing with debt.

Totalitarian regimes, like the Chinese and the Cubans, don’t have our debt problems, because in the case of the Chinese, they work hard and have a government that is immune to public opinion, and in the case of the Cubans, nobody sane would lend the large amounts of money in the first place.

That’s Where the Money Is

June 9th, 2010 by John Feehery

Heavily borrowing from a principle first employed by Willie Sutton, an infamous bank robber, Senate Democrats are pushing through an obscure tax provision that will accomplish pretty much the same goal:  Stealing money from productive members of society because that is where the money is.

The provision is called carried interest, and it is targeted at people who do their business primarily through business partnerships.

I am not in any way an expert on tax law.  It makes my head spin.  The tax code is so intricate, so detailed, so built for those who can afford to hire tax attorneys, that for most normal people, it is well beyond comprehension.

That is why I turn to smart guys like Doug Holtz-Eakin, the former Congressional Budget Office Director, who can help me make sense of what politicians are trying to do to take more money away from taxpayers.  And Doug has put together an illuminating paper on the unintended consequences (or perhaps intended consequences, I can never tell with these Democrats), of the new carried interest tax proposal being currently debating as part of a tax extenders bill that is on the floor of the Senate (http://americanactionforum.org/files/TaxTreatmentCarriedInterest.pdf).  The impact on the economy is most likely going to be negative.  Most who are in partnerships now will likely hire lawyers who will find ways to do business without being subject to this new tax.

International Tax Policy, Blah, Blah, Blah

April 21st, 2010 by John Feehery

International tax policy is boring.

Jobs, American competitiveness, and the future of the world economy and America’s place in it, is not so boring.

The boring stuff has a profound impact on the more exciting stuff.

This morning, Doug Holtz-Eakin, the President of the American Action Forum, hosted a policy forum entitled “Why Does International Tax Policy Matter.” The forum included presentations by rising political star Paul Ryan, a House Republican from Wisconsin; Gene Sperling, a senior Counselor to the Treasury Secretary; William Beach, an economics scholar from the Heritage Foundation; and Barbara Angus, a highly-regarded international tax lawyer who used to work for the Treasury Department.

The presentations varied in their excitement level, ranging from somewhat interesting, to kind of boring to deathly boring.  For the layman (and I consider myself a layman), the stuff might be dull, but there is nothing dull about the real impact of our current international tax policy.  It is killing jobs and facilitating the movement of our companies from the US to places elsewhere, usually through mergers or acquisitions.  If you don’t believe me, think now who owns the King of Beers.

The Bipartisan Health Care Mirage

March 18th, 2010 by John Feehery

I had a brief chat with Dennis Kucinich and his wife last night at the Radio Television Correspondents Dinner.  While I rarely agree with Mr. Kucinich, I think he is very nice, very intellectually consistent, and a very passionate promoter of his ideals.

We talked about the pressures that the Democrats were under to vote for the health care bill that came from the White House.  We didn’t talk about the pressure to vote against it that is coming from the American people.

Now, I imagine that Kucinich didn’t get as much pressure from his constituents to vote against it, being that his district is pretty liberal.  So, I had always assumed that he would be voting for it, which of course, he is going to be doing.

Obviously, neither the New York Times nor the Washington Post made that same assumption, because they put his “decision” to vote for the Senate bill and the reconciliation side care on the front pages of their respective papers, in the apparent attempt to show that the President has some real “Joe-mentum” as Joe Lieberman might put it.