Posts Tagged ‘David Brooks’

Tsunami

March 12th, 2011 by John Feehery

I neglected to turn on the television this morning, and I read the paper oblivious to what was occurring on the other side of the earth.

David Brooks wrote a column in the Times today about America’s addiction to its own healthy ego. As a people, we think we are smarter, better looking and that other people really like us a lot more than is actually the case.

I thought about that column when I turned on the radio and heard about the Tsunami that devastated Japan. For some reason, the virtue of humility came to my mind.

We could all use a good dose of humility, especially as we make assumptions about the future. We don’t know what the future holds, although it certainly makes sense to make plans, it makes more sense to focus on living each day as fully as possible.

Those poor people who were swept away by the tidal wave caused by the 8.9 magnitude earthquake woke up that morning expecting that they would just have a normal day.

Tokyo residents whose whole lives are dependent on electricity now have to face a world without any power (at least for the foreseeable future). Imagine how scary that is.

Fixing the Union Problem

October 13th, 2010 by John Feehery

NJ Transit photo (courtesy JENNIFER BROWN/THE STAR-LEDGER)

David Brooks had a good column yesterday about why New Jersey can’t afford to invest in a new tunnel to connect his state with New York (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/12/opinion/12brooks.html?_r=1&ref=opinion). Chris Christie, the unlikely rock star governor, says that the Garden State just can’t afford it, and if you take one look at its balance sheet, you know he is right.

New Jersey, like Illinois, California, New York and many other states that are dominated by the Democratic Party, can’t afford to pay for big projects because they are spending all of their money on their employees, many of whom no longer work for the state.

Because state employees are represented by unions, and because unions play big in local and state races, these states are going broke. State employee unions have a vested interest in keeping their members happy. And how do you keep union members happy? You fight for full benefits (better benefits than you can get in the private sector), you fight to keep retiree health care benefits (better benefits than you can get in the private sector), you to fight to keep defined benefit pensions (much better than the private sector), and you fight to allow all of these benefits to start kicking in not a certain age, but at a certain period of service.

Are Tea-Partiers Really Conservative?

March 5th, 2010 by John Feehery

I hate it when David Brooks writes a column on a subject that I have been researching on and planning to write about for weeks.  And he did it to me this morning, with a great column about “The Wall Mart Hippies” (http://budurl.com/2r5v).

His central thesis is that tea-party crowd is not really conservative at all.  “Both the New Left and the Tea Party movement are radically anticonservative. Conservatism is built on the idea of original sin — on the assumption of human fallibility and uncertainty. To remedy our fallen condition, conservatives believe in civilization — in social structures, permanent institutions and just authorities, which embody the accumulated wisdom of the ages and structure individual longings.  That idea was rejected in the 1960s by people who put their faith in unrestrained passion and zealotry. The New Left then, like the Tea Partiers now, had a legitimate point about the failure of the ruling class. But they ruined it through their own imprudence, self-righteousness and naïve radicalism. The Tea Partiers will not take over the G.O.P., but it seems as though the ’60s political style will always be with us — first on the left, now the right.”