Posts Tagged ‘Civil Rights Act of 1964’

On the Nature of Freedom in a Multi-Cultural Society

June 28th, 2010 by John Feehery

Taking my dog out for a walk in my neighborhood, I passed by two grand old houses that were clearly in a state of disrepair.  I saw my friend Tony, who lives next to them, and asked what the back story was.  He told me about a lady who owned several houses on Capitol Hill, where I live, who moved away but keeps ownership of the houses.

“It’s kind of a fetish thing with her.  As soon as the DC government threatens to tear the houses down, she pays her back taxes and they back off,” Tony said.

The houses are eyesores.  Their floors are crumbling in.  Who knows what goes on inside of them?

Fetish or no, the owner’s actions are irresponsible, a threat to her neighbors’ property and a perfect reason for the government to move in and take action.

Government exists for a reason:  To take collective action on behalf of the people when the general welfare requires it.

The story of the abandoned houses got me thinking about the nature of freedom in a multi-cultural society as big and as complex as the United States.  The rise of the Tea Party movement has challenged the 20th century consensus for what is and what isn’t the appropriate role for government.

Don’t Take the Bait

May 21st, 2010 by John Feehery

Reductio Ad Absurdem

May 21st, 2010 by John Feehery

In 1803, emissaries from the American President, including future President James Monroe, signed a treaty, which was then the largest real estate purchase in history.  Thomas Jefferson authorized his ambassadors to sign the Louisiana Purchase Treaty despite some misgiving he had about its constitutionality.  He did it because he thought it was a great deal (it was – 15 million bucks for property which would later make up parts of 14 states), and because he wanted to enhance American security.

He was opposed in his efforts to make the purchase by Federalists, who while they appreciated the expansion of federal power (being Federalists and all), didn’t like so much money going to a sworn enemy of the English, who they liked.  So, the Federalists made a big stink about Jefferson’s lack of philosophical consistency, as they themselves showed that they lacked any philosophical consistency by opposing an expansion of federal power, which philosophically, they supported.

Had Jefferson been a stickler for his philosophy, American history would have taken a dramatically different course.  Instead of a sprawling and vibrant democracy powered by Manifest Destiny in the 19th and 20th centuries, the United States would have been hemmed in by European powers France, Spain and Great Britain, where it would have become at best a second-rate power.