<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Feehery Theory &#187; Charlie Rangel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefeeherytheory.com/tag/charlie-rangel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefeeherytheory.com</link>
	<description>Theories on all kinds of things, but mostly politics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:01:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Numbers</title>
		<link>http://www.thefeeherytheory.com/2010/11/19/numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefeeherytheory.com/2010/11/19/numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 15:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Feehery</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Rangel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geithner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefeeherytheory.com/?p=2364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charlie Rangel admitted yesterday that he isn’t very good with numbers.    He took the blame for not paying his taxes, but being bad at numbers isn’t anything new for the Democratic Party.
The Treasury Secretary, Mr. Geithner, isn’t very good with numbers either.  We all know that he forgot to pay his [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefeeherytheory.com/2010/11/19/numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Payback</title>
		<link>http://www.thefeeherytheory.com/2010/08/02/payback/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefeeherytheory.com/2010/08/02/payback/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Feehery</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[African-Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Rangel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefeeherytheory.com/?p=1773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Four years ago, Charlie Rangel endorsed Hillary Clinton for President, and he stuck with that endorsement until the last possible moment, until it became clear to just about everybody that Barack Obama, and not Hillary Clinton, was going to be the Democratic nominee for President.
Rangel endorsed Clinton for a variety of reasons.  Clinton was his [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefeeherytheory.com/2010/08/02/payback/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No cash, no campaigns</title>
		<link>http://www.thefeeherytheory.com/2010/05/18/no-cash-no-campaigns-originally-posted-in-the-hill-newspaper/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefeeherytheory.com/2010/05/18/no-cash-no-campaigns-originally-posted-in-the-hill-newspaper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 14:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Feehery</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fundraising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign contributions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Rangel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman-Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Halliburton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Murtha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Foley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom DeLay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefeeherytheory.com/?p=1338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
Originally posted at http://thehill.com/opinion/op-ed/98251-no-cash-no-campaigns
It has become an almost weekly ritual, especially in the Age of Obama.
A major corporation, let’s say Goldman Sachs or British Petroleum, or in days past, Enron or Halliburton, gets into some hot water politically.
The inevitable committee hearings are called, and the major executives of said corporations are brought before the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefeeherytheory.com/2010/05/18/no-cash-no-campaigns-originally-posted-in-the-hill-newspaper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Life is Complicated For Speaker Pelosi</title>
		<link>http://www.thefeeherytheory.com/2010/03/06/life-is-complicated-for-speaker-pelosi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefeeherytheory.com/2010/03/06/life-is-complicated-for-speaker-pelosi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 15:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Feehery</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bart Stupak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Rangel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denny Hastert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Massa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Foley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom DeLay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ways and Means Committee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefeeherytheory.com/?p=1103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The resignation of Congressman Eric Massa complicates the life of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.  And her life is already pretty complicated.
Of course, it means one less vote for a health care bill that Congressional Democrats are trying to get through a reluctant House.
And one vote is a big deal, because it looks like pro-life Democrats [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefeeherytheory.com/2010/03/06/life-is-complicated-for-speaker-pelosi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Pelosi Stuck With Rangel</title>
		<link>http://www.thefeeherytheory.com/2010/03/04/why-pelosi-stuck-with-rangel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefeeherytheory.com/2010/03/04/why-pelosi-stuck-with-rangel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Feehery</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Rangel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crazy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Rostenkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pete Stark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Gibbons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Foley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ways and Means Committee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefeeherytheory.com/?p=1087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charlie Rangel is not crazy.  He may be liberal.  He may be corrupt.  He may be a partisan.  But he is not crazy.
The same cannot be said of Pete Stark, the man who will take Charlie Rangel’s place.
This reminds me a little bit of when Tom Foley had to find a replacement for Dan Rostenkowski [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefeeherytheory.com/2010/03/04/why-pelosi-stuck-with-rangel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting Caught in The Changing Times</title>
		<link>http://www.thefeeherytheory.com/2010/03/03/getting-caught-in-the-changing-times/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thefeeherytheory.com/2010/03/03/getting-caught-in-the-changing-times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Feehery</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fundraising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Rangel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Wilson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CODELs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Abramoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbyist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefeeherytheory.com/?p=1084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“The times, they are a changing.”
That anthem of the 60’s should always be in the minds of all Hill ethics counselors.
Charlie Rangel’s troubles with the Ethics Committee follow a familiar path.
I remember well in November of 1994, when an obscure challenger named Michael Patrick Flanagan knocked off a powerful Ways and Means Chairman who had [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thefeeherytheory.com/2010/03/03/getting-caught-in-the-changing-times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

