John Feehery: Speaking Engagements

Header

A Modest Education Proposal

Posted on January 14, 2016
"School-education-learning-1750587-h" by woodleywonderworks - http://www.flickr.com/photos/wwworks/2458666314/. Licensed under CC BY 2.0 via Commons - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:School-education-learning-1750587-h.jpg#/media/File:School-education-learning-1750587-h.jpg

"School-education-learning-1750587-h" by woodleywonderworks - http://www.flickr.com/photos/wwworks/2458666314/. Licensed under CC BY 2.0 via Commons - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:School-education-learning-1750587-h.jpg#/media/File:School-education-learning-1750587-h.jpg



I have a modest education proposal.

Ok, it’s not modest. It’s revolutionary.

I was talking to my brother, the libertarian, and we were having a discussion about Common Core. He hates it.

And he had an idea, which I think is intriguing.

He believes that money should follow good teachers and good administrators.

The marketplace should decide which teachers are rewarded and which teachers are not.

The Federal government spends approximately $74 billion on education, a drop in the bucket compared to the more than $620 billion spent by state and local governments.

Some schools are very, very good and some schools are very, very bad.

And the truth of the matter is that you really don’t have much control.

Worse, if your kids are in a good school, but they have a bad teacher, there is literally nothing that a parent can do.

They can bitch, they can complain, they can home-school or they can send their kids to a private school, but most parents don’t have that kind of money or that kind of flexibility. And what usually happens, is the kids are just stuck with the bad teacher.

Everybody knows the bad teachers. Bad teachers lose control of the classroom. Bad teachers don’t know the subject matter. Bad teachers basically mail it in. Bad teachers teach science but coach football.

Good teachers aren’t necessarily the easy teachers. Good teachers are the ones that feel passionate about their jobs. Good teachers know the subject matter. Good teachers challenge their students. Good teachers keep control of their classrooms.

Good teachers should get compensated for their efforts, while bad teachers shouldn’t.

Why can’t the marketplace decide who are the good teachers and who are the bad teachers?

So, here is my proposal.

Give every parent a $10,000 refundable tax credit. And with that tax credit, give parents the power to shop for the best teacher.

Maybe the best teacher is at the local Charter school. Maybe the best teacher is at the local Catholic school. Maybe the best teacher is down the block, at the local elementary school.

There are approximately 50 million students in America today. My proposal would cost about 500 billion dollars.

But imagine what would happen if each parent had the power to decide where to send their kids to school. Imagine what would happen, as more good teachers flood into the marketplace, confident that they would be compensated for their efforts.

Imagine the power this proposal would give parents in the toughest neighborhoods. They wouldn’t have to hope for a good lottery number. They could shop around for the best place to send their kids to school.

They wouldn’t be beholden to the Teachers union. And teachers wouldn't be beholden to administrators. They could actually work to please their customers, who are the teachers and parents.

I think if we tried this proposal, we wouldn’t necessarily need programs like No Child Left Behind. The marketplace would make teachers accountable. If they sucked, customers wouldn’t sign up for their classes.

And with this proposal, you wouldn’t necessarily need state and local taxes to pay to build schools. The marketplace would work, as private or non-profit entities would rush in to fill the void.

What about athletic programs and the arts? Well, that could and should be spent as part of the refundable tax credit budget. And I have question:  Why should kids who don't play football have to pay for it?

What about universal pre-K? That would be covered.  Parents would be encourage to use their money to pay for universal pre-K programs.

And here’s another idea. A parent can save the money to pay education expenses at a later time. If you have money left over, it would roll to the next year.

We spend a trillion dollars every year on Social Security and almost half of that on Medicare.  Isn't it time we invest in our future by really investing in our kids.

Education is broken in this country and so is trust.

Let’s break up the education establishment monopoly and give parents, students and teachers more power to perform.

It’s a modest proposal.